Aaron Luk's Collective Experience [entries|userinfo|friends|rss|archive]
[ about me | livejournal userinfo ]
[ film | index of film reviews (2004-2012) ]
[ tv | index of television reviews ]
[ stageblog | saying things out loud ]
[ misc | miscellaneous essays ]
[ résumé | academic and professional history ]
[ portfolio | artwork and software samples ]
[ social networks | friendster|myspace ]
[ feedback | pure [dot] enjoyment [at] gmail [dot] com ]

13. SIDE EFFECTS [Feb. 24th, 2013|01:05 am]
dir. Steven Soderbergh, USA 2013.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2053463

Side Effects

"We didn't go looking for you. We just looked at the world."

I hope that Soderbergh won't retire from movies as stated, but his ostensibly final theatrical release very effectively expresses the sum total of his career-long creative obsessions. A resonant neo-noir that searingly examines the essential and dysfunctional con game that we call the human condition, from a prime example of auteur theory at its most prolific and collaborative; this is the work of an artist who continually allowed himself and his compatriots to be thrown to the critical and commercial wolves at an impressive rate, by valuing the process over the result, inspiring droves of cinephiles grasping to understand their own trials in storytelling.

Once again serving as his own cinematographer and editor, Soderbergh realizes a vision of purgatory as staid and measured as anything else he's made, with a relatively uncharacteristic dearth of humor, committing fully to the static and understated aesthetic that still comes primarily from his pragmatism, but finds sublime expression in a wickedly involving script from CONTAGION's Scott Z. Burns. As with their previous project, writer and director structure the proceedings around professional proceduralism, with death and dystopia continually haunting the background. Rather than presenting the narrative as an urgent quest for survival (though its elements remain a driving factor, just with slightly less dire stakes for the bulk of the players), Burns and Soderbergh step back to dissect the pursuit of happiness in a society whose history has been fraught with institutional and personal lies of all scales, that stand in for that goal.

It's difficult to imagine a more perfect actress in the central role other than Rooney Mara, subverting the hardened assertiveness she demonstrated so powerfully in David Fincher's THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO, where she managed to make even the steely alpha Daniel Craig appear soft and submissive. Here her pale skin and wide eyes put forth a visage that is a blank slate that demands that both the audience and characters attempt to fill in with any number of dramatic motivations and emotions. Her choices throughout are worthy of closer study, a masterwork of quiet sex appeal beneath a pained soul ever reserved about the future. By contrast, Jude Law's perfectly pressed suits and rugged yet negligibly presentable stubble convey a figure who has never known less than a perfect world, not really, yet can easily find himself in the most modern and timeless of troubles, as a man with much to lose.

Soderbergh regulars Channing Tatum and Catherine Zeta-Jones round out the lead cast, proving again just why so many actors return to work with this director who values their ability and desire to build off of their prior archetypes into something new and unexplored in their career. Perhaps this deliberately journeyman auteur has earned a rest after so many years of service, but I have to think that he won't be able to resist tinkering further with the medium for long, and has more to show us.
linkpost comment

12. SOUND CITY [Feb. 23rd, 2013|01:08 pm]
dir. David Grohl, USA 2013.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2306745/

sound city

SOUND CITY boasts an embarrassment of riches of rock gods at work, coming together in honor of the structures, equipment, and raw/restrictive immediacy that make music happen. Knowing little about the project going in, I was gleefully unspoiled for the history it recollects, and then proceeds to augment with its own new chapter.

As glossy and polished as its subject matter is not, the cinematography and editing unfurl the narrative and relationships beautifully, hitting each breathtaking dramatic reveal with a drummer's precision-- and there's something sweet in superstar Dave Grohl making sure that the below-the-line folks working at the famed studio come off looking like a million bucks, while allowing his fellow above-the-line performers like Rick Springfield to be wrenchingly introspective about the decisions they'd made in its darkest days. ProTools gets ripped pretty thoroughly by all who are interviewed about its contributions to the industry here, yet Grohl takes care to trumpet Trent Reznor as a musician who uses technology to further his art, and the documentary itself looks shot and edited digitally, implicitly embracing the idea that these tools need not corrupt the creative process, when deployed with the hard-learned lessons of analog experience, or at least a healthy respect for the creative power of its fidelity and limitations, at hand. Fittingly, the disc used by the venue tonight began skipping incessantly an hour in, and was switched out, to complete our audience immersion in the movie's meta-chorus.

As NoisePop begins to take over the city's music scene this week and next, and just after Kurt Cobain's birthday, experiencing this heartfelt ode to creative chemistry is uplifting at just the right time, shared with a like-minded crowd in the confined space of the Little Roxie. Take the stage, immortals! Your fans are listening.
linkpost comment

5. REBECCA [Jan. 17th, 2013|12:17 am]
dir. Alfred Hitchcock, USA 1940.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032976

Rebecca

"I told you I've done a very selfish thing in marrying you-- I love you, and I will always love you.

But I knew Rebecca would win, in the end."

First time seeing my favorite Hitchcock in 35mm, by way of a battered print that scraped by to convey the bulk of the film's visual majesty. Impressive and appreciative crowd tonight (this series is likely the most popular one that this venue has had in a while); they were able to avoid mocking the clumsy rear projection and melodramatic musical swells, though the lesbian overtones might have caught them off-guard.

I absolutely adore and revere Joan Fontaine in this movie-- the range exhibited in her various levels of social awkwardness and bolstered resolution are immersive and relatable, as she wrangles the gender dynamics in a way that represents the times, and yet also fits in with a more progressive model, through her discovery and strength of personality, all with her character never needing to be named in the piece! Laurence Olivier, while generally not a big proponent of nuance in his acting, seems to make an effort to exercise restraint here as a man ravaged and haunted by the choices he made during his time with the titular spirit. Perhaps his director gave him no other choice; in having George Barnes shoot the grounds of Manderley with as much foreboding and scale as he did (thereby forming a grand influence on Orson Welles and Gregg Toland for the look of CITIZEN KANE), Hitchcock surrounded his star with scenery that would not hesitate to chew back.

Supporting players Judith Anderson, George Sanders, and Reginald Denny take what could have been two-dimensional foils to our overwhelmed protagonists, and instead deliver performances that depict their conflicting values believably and dramatically, with no small amount of magnetic style.

Owning one's past is a massive prerequisite for moving forward, especially in romance. Here, with the luck provided by Daphne du Maurier's well-designed plot, making the leap to do something "selfish" in the hopes of fostering the right life partnership is a risk well worth taking. If you can't share your demons with your spouse, then why expose her to the wear and tear that they've had on you at all?
linkpost comment

85. THE SESSIONS [Oct. 8th, 2012|01:58 am]
dir. Ben Lewin, USA 2012.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1866249/

the-sessions-movie-poster-slice

Conventional wisdom has long been accustomed to the cinematic obsession with physical and/or mental disabilities as a slam dunk with audiences and critics, but such character-driven narratives often touch upon universal experiences in a way that is stronger than that of most other offerings, thanks to a beautiful alchemy in the performances that shines a light on the most humanistic of worldviews. In this case, John Hawkes' take on the immensely remarkable and accomplished poet and journalist Mark O'Brien, who contracted polio at a young age, requiring the near-constant use of an iron lung and a host of caretakers for the bulk of his life, combines a charm and relatability that burnishes the material with an unassailable honesty, taking the character relationships to magnificent heights and emotional resonance.

Like his real-life subject, Hawkes is complemented with a terrifically engaging and supportive ensemble, all of whom share their own takes on love and its inseparable complexities in an earnestly presented series of frank exchanges as O'Brien takes on the challenge of exploring the sexual experience after spending over thirty years hiding from it behind walls of religious guilt, personal fears, and physical limitations. He finds a host of advocates from the various communities that he inhabits - from his church, the newly arrived and progressively empathetic Father Brendan (William H. Macy), from his profession as a writer, a number of physically disabled yet carnally uninhibited interview subjects, including Carmen (Jennifer Kumiyama), and his attendants Vera and Rod (Moon Bloodgood and W. Earl Brown). Following an mutually unexpected awakening and heartbreak with a warmly attractive assistant (Annika Marks), O’Brien finds himself re-evaluating the sensual possibilities in his life as he discovers the options and feelings that he had never considered.

His research for an article on the sex lives of the disabled leads him to sex surrogate and therapist Cheryl, portrayed with a quietly compelling blend of candor, expertise, coaching, and eroding professional detachment by Helen Hunt. This is extremely tricky narrative territory for the actors and screenwriter/director Ben Lewin, not just for the significant depictions of sexual acts so inherent to the character dynamics and arcs, but also for the danger of falling into the conventional tale of doctor and patient stumbling into a courtship of transference. What happened in real life, and expressed here, is much more complex and inspiring, showing the inevitable and staggeringly strong connection that two such driven people on a shared journey would make, without making that connection seem like the end goal, but rather a very personal and transformative experience that enriches and bonds both participants, and delicately enhances their other relationships rather than merely threatening their stability outside the pre-limited number of sessions.

It’s difficult to describe why some of these choices work so well, particularly when Cheryl’s home life is shown in a less than flattering light with her typically disrespectful teenage son (Jarrod Bailey) and her unemployed and increasingly jealous husband Josh (Adam Arkin), but the two somehow impart enough humanity in their brief scenes to never fully come off as antagonists from which Cheryl needs to extract herself, even as Josh convinces her to convert to Judaism to appease his family, despite her own negative experiences in a conservative Catholic upbringing. Their family problems are surmountable in everyday terms, even though they’d be more than enough of an excuse for divorce in a broader mainstream movie; Lewin, himself a polio survivor, and his producing partner and wife of 30 years Judi Levine, along with their daughter and associate producer Alexandra Lewin, understand that household dynamic well, and Arkin especially essays his role honestly as man who unquestionably loves his wife even as he struggles to understand and open a discussion about what’s happening to her.

Similarly, the ensemble is peppered with other romantic foils, played by James Martinez and Ming Lo, who come off as boorish but believable, at ease with the physicality and confidence that is initially alien to O’Brien. Theirs are not presented so much as alternative outlooks, but rather shades of the same spectrum available in the vast variety of sexual experiences and pursuant analysis. The way that the film gives these supporting characters just enough breathing room to flesh out the world outside of O’Brien’s insularity is one of its most effective and resonant traits, gently zeroing in on the imperfect expansiveness facing all of the characters on their own journeys.

Lewin and editor Lisa Bromwell utilize the rhythms and space of these dynamics sublimely, often placing a reaction shot at just the right moment during an extended dramatic sequence. One of the film’s most memorable moments comes from a single shot of Cheryl walking back to her car after a session, tidily packing up her things, all set to go, when Vera catches up to bring her something that she had forgotten. At once, Cheryl is hit with a reverie of emotion beyond mere sadness, longing, accomplishment, or acceptance, but one that Vera immediately understands, and so too does the audience when seeing her expression change upon witnessing Cheryl’s catharsis.

In a post-film Q&A, Hawkes and Lewin discussed how film, more than any other medium, can capture the actual reactions, nervous tension, and chemistry of two characters meeting for the first time, and there have not been many first meetings in cinema as charged as O’Brien’s first session with Cheryl, in which he feels he must meet thirty years of expectations and repression head on (like going to his own execution, as he says to Vera, and in his real-life article describing the experience). Lewin prefers to get performances built out of the trust established between the director and actors during the casting process rather than in rehearsals, and it pays off hugely here as he shot the session scenes in story order, allowing the vital chemistry between Hawkes and Hunt to develop organically before the audience’s eyes.

Composer Marco Beltrami’s cutesy pizzicato, particularly in the film’s opening newsreel montage showing O’Brien’s life as a Cal student, sometimes overemphasizes the lighthearted aspects of the approach, but it does juxtapose well with the stark introductory images of O’Brien in the iron lung, along with the first challenge that he faces in the story proper, when a cat brushes by his nose, which he has no capability of scratching. Right away, the extremity of his condition is relatable and need not be the focus of the themes to come, and in the more dramatic segments, Beltrami loses the playfulness and delivers soaring yet tempered notes that complement the emotions well without getting in the way of the performances. Depicting an impressive amount of emotional complexity all around rather than settling to make a mere inspirational based-on-a-true-story offering, the cast and crew honor their subjects and material with a light touch - like the sessions themselves, gently guiding the audience through rather heavy experiences with earnest empathy and good humor.
linkpost comment

"The Normal Heart" by Larry Kramer (DC production) [Jul. 14th, 2012|01:28 am]
normal-heartIDR

“If I had it, would you leave me?"

With AIDS Walk happening this Sunday, it’s about time I wrote a few words about “The Normal Heart”, Larry Kramer’s stage play written from an insider’s mindset in the initial days of the epidemic, set in the then-present of early-1980’s New York City. Having successfully been revived on Broadway last year to sustained acclaim, the production once again asserts its weighty drama at the Arena Stage in Washington, DC - a locale which knows the disease’s damage all too well. Per The Washington Post, as of 2009, 3% of the city’s population has HIV or AIDS, and so there are certainly relevant political messages to be expressed in this passion play, yet what strongly resonated with me was more its backdrop in its characters' search for identity, desperate to land on some cultural definition of their community and values in the face of every aspect of their being coming under challenge by external forces.

Patrick Breen channels Kramer’s anger to some staggeringly sharp peaks and valleys as Ned Weeks, early gay activist and stand-in for the author, who based the script and characters very closely on his own experiences and fellow travelers wrestling with the toll taken upon their population by the disease as well as their surrounding society’s marked indifference and discordance with their general plight. Weeks wields his words violently entirely on instinct, while managing to sandpaper over various levels of sensitivity that he feels towards those he loves the most, including his dashingly joyful lover Felix (Luke Macfarlane) and his brother Ben (John Procaccino). Ned’s relationship with the latter is especially wrenching - formed by the lives of Kramer and his own brother Arthur, who protected his younger sibling against their parents while remaining yet ultimately disapproving of Larry’s homosexuality. The nuance in these dramatic conflicts is quite compelling, driving the narrative beyond its immediate politics.

The play declaratively eschews victimhood in Act I, wherein its aims are almost flatly stated, which would at first seem lazy, yet effectively primes the audience for the much more complex themes to come. Though Ned/Kramer’s perspective comes off quite mightily, it is perhaps most strongly tempered and countered by the agony pushed upon Michael Berresse’s Mickey Marcus, a professional gay man who comes to live in constant fear of the fallout upon his livelihood and sense of self as a result of their organization’s public pressure upon the government to simply be heard. When he has his own monologue about what the lifestyle of free love and countless partners means to him, it is quite the awakening to see the constant conflict between the empowerment coming from those choices, embracing the sexual freedom so frowned upon by those who had bullied him and others like him all their lives, while coming to terms with the costs incurred.

Director George C. Wolfe and set designer David Rockwell’s approach is a fluid, stark one, using mobile furniture and props wheeled on and off the stage by the actors themselves with swift precision between scenes, which are transitioned by sudden frenzied yet efficient darkness, punctuated with the beats of David van Tieghem’s original music and sound design. Text is also projected onto the stage’s back walls, with various quotes about gay culture as well as the effects of AIDS from sources of all persuasions and opinions. The list of names for the ever-growing number of fatalities from the disease also illuminates the surroundings, fueling the characters’ rage and determination, including that of Dr. Emma Brookner (Patricia Wettig), based on the real-life Linda Laubenstein, who treated countless numbers of initial AIDS patients and came to furiously criticize the government’s sluggish response to the CDC’s key findings and assessments. Brookner’s monologue veers fully into outright messaging, but Wettig grounds it in the character’s own frustration and feelings of powerlessness, elevating the performance above mere didacticism.

I am equally inspired and horrified that Kramer’s text is still as powerful and relevant as it was nearly 30 years ago - surely we as a society can progress beyond the ugly judgmentalism and harmoniously collaborate and discuss these issues in order to solve big problems. There are other diseases that terrify me more than the one at the centerpiece of this play, primarily because their causes are less understood, making prevention that much more challenging, yet the destruction visited by AIDS upon a significant number of an underserved population is one of the longest wakeup calls we as a people have had to acknowledge and address. And so we Walk, we donate, we stay informed. And we look after each other, gaining a deeper understanding of ourselves and our fellows along the way.
linkpost comment

65. MOONRISE KINGDOM [Jun. 13th, 2012|12:37 am]
dir. Wes Anderson, USA 2012.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1748122/

Untitled

Those who already hate Wes Anderson's work are highly unlikely to ever change their minds with each new offering of his that they experience, particularly this one. But those whose sensibilities find themselves in tune with those of this idiosyncratic, resolutely American auteur will feel their appreciation reaching another crescendo with his latest work. Another exploration of wounded children and their broken mentors in the upper-middle class diaspora, this one features actual schoolyard youngsters (Jared Gilman as Sam, and Kara Hayward as Suzy) in the lead roles, making understated and impressive debuts as a pair of runaway lovers on an idyllic island that is home to their families and a centralized retreat for the Khaki Scouts, of which Sam is an learned but downtrodden member, and in which Suzy increasingly finds herself on the outs with her distracted parents and the administrators of the Church in whose pageants she is obliged to participate.

Anderson's vision is as adorable and collaborative as ever, weaving eternally intricate aural and visual designs with deceptively breezy performances to express the redemptive qualities of the character arcs. This body of work would be an interesting pairing with that of fellow director Todd Field (LITTLE CHILDREN, IN THE BEDROOM), similarly rooted in Americana and the institutions at the forefront of its zenith, but with a more sobering and despairing worldview.

Which is not to say that Anderson's films merely prance about with whimsical quirks holding naught but humorous purpose - they issue challenges to the institutions in which they are set (prep schools in RUSHMORE, patriarchies in THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS, matriarchies and colonialism in THE DARJEELING LIMITED, etc.), yet depicting them with fondness with the goal of advancing them rather than merely criticizing or parodying them. Here the institutions represented are the Church and the Boy ("Khaki") Scouts, both of which figured personally into my own childhood, so I had some key connections to the film's themes, having grown up memorizing Bible verses and reading about the adventures of Robert Baden-Powell as a spy in the British military before founding the Scouts. The intimidating yet serene nature of chapels, as well as the invigoration and homesickness attendant with outdoor camping trips are familiar to me, and informed my read into the characters as they navigated their various arcs and conflicts towards a gloriously staged and emotional resolution.

The film's soundtrack is masterfully eclectic, with contributions from both of Anderson's prior composers, Mark Mothersbaugh and Alexandre Desplat, as well as samplings of period country (Hank Williams), chamber music, contemporary classical compositions (showcasing Benjamin Britten), and French love songs. These and other bold choices resonate with consideration and commitment to a clear vision that has room for collaboration (indeed, Anderson has a remarkable ability to communicate his direction while delegating significantly, as when he reportedly made THE FANTASTIC MR. FOX while largely communicating remotely with his crew). Detractors will always abound, but the rest of us can continue to enjoy the enriching experience of watching the progression of this memorable set of careers.
linkpost comment

a poem for the friends and family who helped me understand 6/4 this year [Jun. 5th, 2012|02:58 am]



we grew up silent, holding our hearts in reserve;
our deepest cares never said so out loud.
yet we still forget, granted more than we deserve;
with all things fair, have we made you proud?

as night grows darker, let this not be but a dirge;
our fears laid bare before a mighty crowd.
make this a marker of our strongest surge--
we steer despair away from those so cowed.

yet in the end, we face the same great void,
thus fading so like the faintest cloud.
but my good friend: this hate will be destroyed,
parading without its greatest shroud.


linkpost comment

58. MIS: HUMAN SECRET WEAPON [May. 13th, 2012|08:59 pm]
dir. Junichi Suzuki, Japan/USA 2012.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2318595/

Untitled

"Yesterday's enemy is today's friend."

Narrative filmmaker Junichi Suzuki has recently taken to directing documentaries to relate the history of Japanese Americans, which is relatively unknown and uncelebrated on both sides of the Pacific, despite the massive impact it has had in furthering the multi-cultural resolution, from the most contentious times and the ensuing fallout.

Suzuki's previous offering centered around the more well-known 442nd regiment of Japanese American infantry, who faced combat on the European front, while this latest project lays out the experiences, contributions, and reflections of the Military Intelligence Service (MIS) enlisted men and women serving in the Pacific theater, dating back to even before WWII, and recognized very recently with Congressional Gold Medals.

These Kibei and Nisei were instrumental in interrogations, interceptions, diversions, and other operations of war, but also ended up helping soldiers on both sides retain their humanity in the face of the overwhelming loss of life all around - small memories such as an MIS man evoking an emotional and even grateful response from a Caucasian officer by showing him a photo found on a fallen Japanese combatant, capturing two visages, perhaps the dead man's wife and mother, thereby allowing the officer to recognize their enemies as fellow people, rather than falling into the all-too-easy trap of disengaging from them as Others.

This type of shared empathy also bled out to the other side, such as when a number of Okinawan civilians holed themselves up in caves, prepared to commit governmentally-mandated mass suicide as American forces approached, only to be ultimately rescued physically and emotionally by their brethren in the MIS who could understand them both linguistically and culturally. On a larger scale, the MIS was also present to assist with the post-nuclear devastation, and to help reconstruct the country as a whole following Japan's surrender aboard the USS Missouri.

It's a real privilege to spend time onscreen with these veterans while they are still around, given how rare this information has been. Suzuki bridges the interview footage with lovely digital photography of the relevant landscapes - from San Francisco's Presidio where the MIS were trained to the Imperial Palace, the rich colors set right a turbulent world worth preserving, while an impressive amount of stock footage and photos show the captivating subjects in their prime, juxtaposed with other recognizable historical figures such as MacArthur and Hirohito.

The piece is narrated by Lane Nishikawa, who is a fitting choice given his long career as a proponent of this and other Japanese American history through his stagework, though his delivery is often too authoritative - along with Kitaro's sweeping score, these elements detract from the more reserved and personal nature of these interviews. But these are far from grossly manipulative aesthetic choices, and it is rather dismaying to see this film so coolly received by professional critics. Besides the obvious fact that any effort to record and promote this little-recognized history should be supported rather than nitpicked at, its underlying themes of forgiveness, evinced in so many of its most memorable segments, are utterly timeless and affecting.
linkpost comment

49. LIBERAL ARTS [Apr. 29th, 2012|12:30 pm]
dir. Josh Radnor, USA 2012.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1872818

Untitled

"Think about it- you can walk around here, say 'I'm a poet,' and no one will punch you in the face."

The SF Film Society Members Screening for this year's fest was Josh Radnor's LIBERAL ARTS, a film I would otherwise not have seen, but enjoyed immensely- between just having seen DAMSELS IN DISTRESS, and similarly spent time last week with Cal students as does the protagonist here at his alma mater, Kenyon, while accumulating more visceral reminders of my age as of late, the story and characters are hitting me at just the right time in my life.

Indeed, Radnor captures this moment in the post-quarterlife crisis with tremendous earnestness and introspection, and conveys many relevant emotional ideas with warm visuals- it is so pleasant and invigorating to see American independent movies continue to trend in being so much more grounded and optimistic than their predecessors. Like DAMSELS, the college experience here is closer to the one I had, characterized more by big conversations and soul-searching than boozing and other Dionysian pursuits, which are more part of the atmosphere.

Radnor's script toes the line between treating the characters as devices and actual memories well enough to give the actors room to put their stamp on the material- while the writerly strings are still somewhat apparent, the arcs are so effective that the work stands as a significant benchmark in Radnor's creative evolution, one that is relatable and seems attainable through the passion and empathy that his characters espouse.

Big thanks to SFFS for programming this screening- I've previously kept Radnor and "How I Met Your Mother" at somewhat of a distance, having not quite related to those characters as so many of my friends have, but he really showed me something here, taking personal experience to celebrate the developmental safety of university and what comes after, using the usual homecoming arc and conventions in honest ways that resonated with me more than others of its kind that felt more forced (GARDEN STATE being foremost in my mind at present, though definitely not without its own charms). I can't wait for more of my friends and family to see this film so that we can talk about it together- I'd like nothing better.
link1 comment|post comment

41. DAMSELS IN DISTRESS [Apr. 23rd, 2012|01:43 am]
dir. Whit Stillman, USA 2011.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1667307/

Untitled

"This soap, and this scent, are what give me hope."

14 years after THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO, Whit Stillman's latest has been worth the wait, jam-packed with dialogue, characters, and style that are as witty, elegant, and adorably relatable as ever. Though the story still takes place in a WASP-y conclave (this time a women's college that has recently gone co-ed), it is undeniably a setting of the present, featuring Stillman's most pan-ethnic cast of Americans yet (Megalyn Echikunwoke, "The Wire"'s Jermaine Crawford, and Doug Yasuda, along with cameos from Aubrey Plaza of "Parks and Recreation" and Alia Shawkat of "Arrested Development"), solidifying the (relative) universality of his themes amongst the upper-middle class.

It wouldn't be difficult, as with the previous films, to dismiss the antics and dialogue as broadly un-naturalistic, yet I've always found the characters of these stories to express their ideas and flaws with such specificity, such as the motif of soap and comforting cleanliness in the quote above, that I immediately embraced the film's indulgences and arrogances, which mirror my own, as they wonderfully formed a rabbit hole of frivolously intellectual yet genuinely empathetic conversations - the kind that I have when I'm enjoying life the most.

The cast and crew hit just the right tone to avoid the trivial quirkiness of mumblecore, from the earnestness of the delivery to the heavenly hues of the radiant daytime photography by Doug Emmett (in contrast to the earlier METROPOLITAN and THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO, which took place mostly in the hours of late-night partying) - colors end up playing a key role in the events, and the digital print that I saw did a fine job of making them stand out in the gorgeous settings, though I have not been able to find any technical details of the shoot yet... Stillman strikes me as a director who would try to use film if possible, though the look here certainly served the story well.

Stillman's films continue to welcome audiences with the conviviality of a dinner party (the opening credits are still designed like formal invitations, to my delight), while resonating with an observant wit that opens up both larger musings on the cultivation and preservation of fellowship, as well as the liberating and invigorating rush of allowing yourself to potentially look ridiculous in order to show the world who you are- DISCO especially kicked off this throughline with its closing dance number (following the more contained cha-cha in METROPOLITAN, getting bolder with the limbo in BARCELONA), full-throatily launching into the musical territory that has its own space and time in multiple segments this time around. I'd honestly love to see this movie projected in dance halls, wherein the audience can put away their folding chairs and participate along with the characters, as invited to by the onscreen titles detailing the steps. I state this even as someone who is not necessarily a fan of the sing-along trend that keeps so many repertory movie houses afloat nowadays, so enrapturing did I find the spirit of this experience.

Capping off a Sunday with this film was especially fitting after catching an earlier screening of HARLAN COUNTY USA in honor of director Barbara Kopple's 35+ years of making staggeringly engaging documentaries, as I was first introduced to the works of Stillman and Kopple through their respective episodes of "Homicide: Life on the Street", a show which took the still unparalleled step of continually introducing independent filmmakers to network television, while giving them enough creative freedom to allow their contributions to stand out on their own, prompting fans like me to seek out their other projects, given how distinctive their approaches were to these familiar characters. And what a payoff that effort has continued to yield...
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Site Meter